Living with AI

Living with AI

Pope Leo’s encyclical, Magnifica Humanitas, continues to provoke reflective commentary from multiple perspectives. A recent article, Magnifica Humanitas: Beyond the “Planet of the Apes” syndrome, by Joseph Borg on the Global Catholic website concludes that “Magnifica Humanitas is therefore not a lament but a summons. It calls humanity to engage AI without fear or naïveté, guided by an anthropology that safeguards dignity and nourishes hope.”

Borg recalls that the Planet of the Apes series posited that in a post-apocalyptic world intelligent apes came to dominate humanity and compares that to the widespread fear that Artificial Intelligence (AI) may dominate humanity. In Australia, the recent surge of interest in construction of data centres intended to support the surge in AI use has highlighted the potential risks from excessive consumption of electric energy and water. More immediately it seems the demand for workers to construct AI data centres may pose challenges for construction of much needed housing.

Pope Leo argues that AI is not morally neutral but is designed with assumptions that influence how we view the world and make choices in our lives. The real danger is not that AI will dominate us but that we will be shaped by it in our relationship with each other. The Pope argues that we can resist that danger by drawing on the Christian vision of the person.

It is a short article but worth reading for its insights.

Comments

One response to “Living with AI”

  1. Jim Potts Avatar
    Jim Potts

    Just some information that may add a perspective on that Encyclical by Pope Leo. Ilia Delio has had a long interest in that topic of AI and while she commends and praises the Encyclical in many respects, she has a very strong point about how the Pope grounds the dignity of the human person, about the metaphysics beneath the encyclical. Hers is a Teilhardian perspective and her views in this article seem to me to be consistent with her other writings and teachings, though I am only familiar with some of those and still very much a beginner in grappling with her ideas. See the article  at this link: https://substack.com/@iliadelio/note/p-205507607?r=57ikg5
    She indicates that the ethical vocabulary the Encyclical uses is too narrow, for one thing. She ends by writing: “Magnifica Humanitas is a magnificant beginning. It is not yet the theology of an unfolding humanity that the coming century will require”. It can be challenging reading but I believe that she has a prophetic vision alongside of Teilhard himself. Jim
     

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *