When the blind lead…

When the blind lead…

Eureka Street recently posted an interesting piece by Andrew Phelan, Why the Australian Church needs a vision, not just a process. My browser summarised it thus:

The Australian Church’s response to reform is hindered by three failures: the collapse of institutional trust due to abuse scandals, mutual distrust between clergy and laity, and the absence of a coherent vision for the Church’s future. While formation is important, it is insufficient to address these issues. The Church needs a clear vision of what it aims to become, one that inspires and energises people, rather than relying solely on processes and procedures.

It is worth reading the whole piece to get a sense of what is happening in one diocese, how that falls short of ideal, and how the Australian Church might develop a vision toward which we can move together. The answer is not in blindly following processes or leaders who have no vision for where they wish to lead.

Comments

3 responses to “When the blind lead…”

  1. Brian Bright Avatar
    Brian Bright

    ‘The processes currently underway in this Archdiocese are not evidence of synodal conversion. They are evidence that the language of synodality has been thoroughly mastered while its substance continues to be deferred.’
    While this article is about one diocese, what it highlights would be true to a large extent across most diocese in Australia. There is very little involvement of those outside the clerics and Church employees in the governance of dioceses. Bodies established to advise or assist the bishop on an ongoing basis don’t allow for any dialogue with the baptised faithful. Diocesan financial information is closely guarded. We don’t know where the money is spent and what the priorities are. 

  2. Michael Sibert Avatar
    Michael Sibert

    Should I accept the Invitation to attend my Parish Assembly?

    While being in wholehearted agreement with Andew Phelan’s erudite assessment of why the Australian Catholic Church needs a vision, I suggest that his argument be prefaced with ‘a new’ vision. In my view, there is an unstated but operative vision that most Bishops are running with. The implied operative vision is the status quo defined by parameters such as traditional orthodox pre-Vatican II theology and hierarchical ecclesiology.

    I can relate to Phelan’s context in the Canberra-Goulburn diocese with the forced amalgamation of 4 parishes and the absence of complete openness and transparency. I live in the Blackbutt North Parish of the Maitland-Newcastle Diocese which is also formally 3 parishes and have been invited to attend the upcoming Parish Assembly. The warm and seemingly positive invite states “Come and Have Your Say” and “Your Parish, Your Voice”. This invite puts me into a bit of a quandary. Namely – is it worth while attending? Are our two overseas Priests (both intelligent, caring, charming people) really ready to hear my voice?

    On the surface at least, the Diocesan and Parish councils seem to have been established “to foster synodal leadership, collaboration, and transparency” to quote the Diocesan website, and in accord with the Code of Canon Law 511-514 and 536 for the Parish Pastoral Councils. However, I also note the following sub-text lines within 514 – “The council holds only a consultative vote, and only the diocesan bishop can convoke or preside over it” and 536 – “The (parish) council holds a consultative vote only, meaning it advises but cannot dictate policy.” Previous experience on Parish Pastoral Councils leads me to be very sceptical in relation to Bishops and Priests openness to creative change, and I understand the general inclination of those ordained to authority to conserve tradition. Which brings me back to Andrew Phelan’s call for a vision.

    Recently I have been energetically envisioned upon reading Ilia Delio’s book ‘The Not Yet God’ which dares to imagine some radical offloading of outdated orthodox teachings such as the immutability of God, original sin, atonement and redemption theology, heaven, supernatural beings, and an ecclesial blueprint based on an unchangeable literal reading of scripture. Delio’s vision for a meaningful and relevant church for the 21st century and beyond takes seriously the implications of the science of evolution and quantum physics. Built upon the work of Teilhard de Chardin, Carl Jung and Paul Tillich, Delio provides a vision of God as intimately entangled with the materiality of the cosmos and its moment to moment becoming within all beings and all things. Her non-dualistic, non-hierarchical theology praises diversity and acceptance of all within the reality of the fundamental interconnectedness of all things. This vision of God could provide a new democratic vitality to a Church serious about being a religion the world needs now.

    Human consciousness is evolving. Many like those engaged with St Lucia Spirituality, are now aware that the “fully human, fully divine” teaching on Jesus is true of all people and are working with God’s intimate presence in themselves and their lives each day without the need for clerical go-betweens. Many more however are not. Most of the Catholics I know will never see the invitation to come to their parish assembly as they are not ‘in the pews’ anymore and most of those good people who do accept the invitation and attend will be ‘blind’ to a vision of God & Church that could really invigorate the deepest desires of their Parish Assembly and Pastoral Plan.         

  3. […] comments and ‘likes’. To date such interaction has been limited but one recent item, When the blind lead…, has prompted a couple of comments. If you scroll down the News & views page you will see that […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *